ARCHIPRÊTRE JEAN BRECK Paris: Editions du Cerf (); Romanian translation: Puterea Cuvântului în . “John Appendix, Epilogue or Conclusion ?. Descripción: MANUAL DE DOCTRINA CONTABLE ÚTIL Y SENCILLO DE ENTENDER. Surprins de Puterea Duhului · DOCTRINA POLICIAL · doctrina. John Breck, Puterea cuvântului în Biserica dreptmăritoare, Editura Institutu- lui Biblic și de Misiune al Bisericii Ortodoxe Române, București, , p.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||9 August 2016|
|PDF File Size:||15.49 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.88 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
To the ancients, however, significant texts contain multiple layers of meaning. These included occasional uses of allegory as well as metaphor and simile.
The type retains its value as a reality in its own right; but it is also an iconan image of a future fulfillment that is already present within it. They need brevk adopt, in fact, a different world-view, one that incorporates the basic perspective of antiquity, and specifically of the Church Fathers.
Puterea Calmului – Doctrina Japoneza
In terms of hermeneutical method, Alexandria is seen as the home of allegory and Antioch the home of typology. In 1 Cor The first point to make is that the type-antitype relationship is neither strictly linear nor unidirectional. This, however, does not necessarily imply forward historical movement.
Similar allegory is found in the parables of the Two Sons Mt Between type and antitype, there is reciprocity, mutual indwelling of one in the other, independent of time.
It searches the depths of Scriptural passages with the aim of discovering divine presence within the world and within human experience, as that presence manifests itself through a chain or sequence akolouthia of events. SCM Press,pp.
The correspondence Ford draws between picture and meaning on the one hand, and the hypostatic union in Christ on the other, is especially helpful for our attempt to reassess and finally restore allegory as a legitimate, and indeed essential feature of biblical interpretation.
The second presupposition sees typology and allegory as representing two different world-views, such that as exegetical methods they are basically incompatible, even contradictory. Whereas typology respects the historical grounding of the type-antitype relationship, allegory tends to ignore that grounding by locating the true meaning of a biblical passage not in historical events, cuvvantului on a transcendent plane of being, as well as in the moral and spiritual life of the believer.
Allegory : Exegetical Method Or Spiritual Vision? | Wellspring
As a result, the historical grounding of a given passage could be ignored or at least relegated to a position of secondary importance. Early Christians were convinced that the risen Lord spoke through the apostolic authors by the inspirational power of the Spirit.
In 1 Cor 5: Allegory and typology refer more appropriately to interpretive methods. Yet the Word, the Person of the eternal Logos, is not limited to the canonical text, but reveals himself within the entire liturgical-sacramental life of the Church.
Colectionarul De Surprize – Google+
From narrative criticism to rhetorical analysis the role of parallelism and chiasmus in Scripture, for examplethe efforts of biblical scholars in recent years have offered precious new insights into the way Scripture embodies and conveys meaning. As Young, Louth and others have recently shown, allegory and typology both aim to achieve a theoria of ultimate reality and ultimate meaning.
The chief differences between the two schools may be schematically noted as follows. Istituto Patristico Augustinianum, ; S. Hellenic College Press,p. If it is not, we attribute the obscurity to bad writing. This is because the antitype is proleptically realized in the type itself.
Allegory : Exegetical Method Or Spiritual Vision?
If we speak of two basic meanings in Scripture, the literal usually identified with the historical sense and the spiritual, Alexandrian exegetes clearly gave priority to the latter, often at the expense cuvantulu the historical meaning. In 1 Cor 9: This fails to recognize, however, that Hebrew thought moves not only from past to future, but from future to past: It is bi-directional, insofar as there is between type and antitype a relationship of mutual participation.
The typological relationship is double: The first holds that typology is essentially linear and unidirectional, moving through history from the past type to the future antitype. Institutului Biblic si de Misiune, The parable of the Tares Mt Given recent advances in understanding the way texts function, including the insights of narrative and reader-response criticism, it is a principle that would be well worth recovering.
Revelation occurs less through historical event than through the words of a text, which are taken to be a code that needs to be bredk in order to discover the higher, fuller sense of the passage.